Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
7
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Ford's electric-vehicle strategy[2016/09/22]
-
English Web For RHI INC[2014/04/08]
-
California lawmakers and environmentalists battle plastic bag industry over ban[2016/09/28]
-
Global Connector Industry[2016/10/29]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Surface Pro 3 plagued by more battery problems[2016/09/23]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]